Halo 4

General discussion, shows, and everything else.

Postby YourXd43 » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:20 pm

I did a search and surprisingly didnt find any threads about Halo 4 yet. The reviews are coming out today and damn im excited. It got a 9.8 from ign http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/01/halo-4-review and a 5/5 from machinima http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/11/01/halo-4-review/ the 6th cant come fast enough
YourXd43
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:48 am
Location: woodbridge

Postby the religion lie » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:21 pm

Just watched that IGN review and when the reviewer says he hasn't been this excited for a Halo since Halo 2, I knew it was legitimate excitement and happiness from him. Way pumped for this game and I didn't think I would be.
the religion lie
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Postby uncledaddy69 » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:22 pm

I'd probably buy it if I could afford video games right now.
uncledaddy69
 
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:52 pm

Postby noteventherain » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:23 pm

main reason I'm not buying AC3
User avatar
noteventherain
 
Posts: 2309
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Colorado

Postby YourXd43 » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:23 pm

noteventherain wrote:main reason I'm not buying AC3

same here, It looks like a good game but i'll wait until my excitement from halo 4 has died down so i can full appreciate it
YourXd43
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:48 am
Location: woodbridge

Postby GRENADEFACE » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:26 pm

Seriously, can't wait any longer! Been playing Halo since the CE and honestly this game looks like its gonna set the bar pretty damn high. :smt003
GRENADEFACE
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:58 pm
Location: Michigan Straight Edge

Postby forever cursed » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:27 pm

I didn't think I'd be psyched but the reviews I'm seeing are slowly starting to change my mind. I thought ODST and Reach were the best in the series.
User avatar
forever cursed
 
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:40 pm
Location: Baltimore

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:31 pm

I'm excited for the game but I hate how they are building the game to appease Call of Duty fans. Introducing armor abilities on spawn was an awful addition on Reach and they continue with the COD features with the point system from assists and medals and shit in this multiplayer. The random weapon spawns are also an awful feature in my opinion. If they completely leave out the 1-50 leveling system again it will be a huge mistake also.

Halo has been downhill since 2, but 3 was still extremely playable. Reach just wans't fun and this reminds me a lot more of Reach then it does 2 or 3.

I'll be buying it but I'm ready for disappointment more then enjoyment.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby theXdXman » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:33 pm

i'm buying an xbox solely because of this game. my brother has xbox, and when we lived together i'd just play his. we'd play halo 3 for hours. still do anytime i see him. can't fucking wait to waste my life away with this game.

my old gamer tag was danthemangina. shit got reported and i had to change it to danthemanhc. can i reactivate that shit?
User avatar
theXdXman
 
Posts: 12943
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: rochester, new york

Postby xorangejuicex » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:38 pm

So excited for this, multiplayer is gonna be a blast and spartan ops looks like it'll rule. I haven't really looked up anything on the campaign to avoid spoilers, but I hope it's good. Reach was probably my favorite campaign out of all the games so far.
xorangejuicex
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:46 am
Location: Menifee

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:47 pm

I will say one good thing about this game though, the reintroduction of the BR. If had had to try to finish of kids flying around the fucking map with their dumbass jetpacks or that stupid fucking armor lock with that shitty DMR again I wouldn't even be picking up the game.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby Mighty Professional » Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:47 pm

While I enjoy being a student, it's times like this that I wish I had a full-time job.
User avatar
Mighty Professional
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:19 pm

Postby reprehensible » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:02 pm

I quit caring/paying attn post-Bungie, but this thread has my interest piqued.
User avatar
reprehensible
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:02 pm
Location: TX

Postby peteooo » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:02 pm

Wait for player/indie site reviews, any of the mainstream site's reviews don't mean shit.
peteooo
 
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:07 am
Location: Somerville

Postby AGERSTONE » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:05 pm

peteooo wrote:Wait for player/indie site reviews, any of the mainstream site's reviews don't mean shit.


If it gets Jeff's vote then I'm on board http://www.giantbomb.com/halo-4/61-35533/reviews/
User avatar
AGERSTONE
 
Posts: 2363
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:34 am
Location: THE NORTH

Postby Watch Out For Snakes » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:08 pm

I'll buy it but I'm not getting my hopes up for anything. I'm expecting more of the same bullshit overkill features from Reach.
Watch Out For Snakes
 
Posts: 4310
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:07 pm

Postby 3xCloud » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:34 pm

the religion lie wrote:Just watched that IGN review and when the reviewer says he hasn't been this excited for a Halo since Halo 2, I knew it was legitimate excitement and happiness from him. Way pumped for this game and I didn't think I would be.


This is the same thing I was thinking, this has to be legit right?

This was also an interesting read for those who don't like mainstream reviews, not that this is a review just the process

http://updates.kotaku.com/post/34775753950/how-it-feels-to-review-halo-4-on-microsofts-turf
3xCloud
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:10 am
Location: Chicago

Postby tovegantinued » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:38 pm

I've been playing since CE. I've embraced every sequel and haven't been let down. People get "the demo's better" syndrome over CE and Halo 2. Which were great games. But sequels have to evolve, If they made Halo 2 again, it would be crap. Nostalgia aside, 3 and Reach were improvements in so many ways.

I didn't know what to expect with the transfer of Bungie to 343. But it honestly looks awesome and the only negative thing I've heard is people crying about the sprint feature making it like COD. Which is silly, it was my favorite load out on Reach and in no way imaginable has any Halo game ever felt like COD to me.
tovegantinued
 
Posts: 5175
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:31 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Postby Watch Out For Snakes » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:40 pm

tovegantinued wrote:I've been playing since CE. I've embraced every sequel and haven't been let down. People get "the demo's better" syndrome over CE and Halo 2. Which were great games. But sequels have to evolve, If they made Halo 2 again, it would be crap. Nostalgia aside, 3 and Reach were improvements in so many ways.

I didn't know what to expect with the transfer of Bungie to 343. But it honestly looks awesome and the only negative thing I've heard is people crying about the sprint feature making it like COD. Which is silly, it was my favorite load out on Reach and in no way imaginable has any Halo game ever felt like COD to me.

The controls for 3 were sluggish compared to 2, and the extra shit (jet pack, run fast, power shield) for Reach was just carbon copying stuff from other game franchises to stay relevant. Bungie has admitted that development for Reach was rushed and, by and large, the final product suffered for it.

Halo 2 was a nearly perfect game. Fluid controls, nearly flawless weapons choices, no superfluous bullshit features. Save for the glitches, hacks and triple shot BR nonsense, it was perfect. People get nostalgic over it because it was a superior video game.
Watch Out For Snakes
 
Posts: 4310
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:07 pm

Postby J.o. » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:44 pm

so are the power-ups going to be in this as well? I won't miss them if they're not.
User avatar
J.o.
 
Posts: 1375
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 1:52 am
Location: Ontario

Postby HeroesToTheRescue » Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:58 pm

Stoked for it, gonna be playing online right at midnight get at me
Goremageddon187
User avatar
HeroesToTheRescue
 
Posts: 2980
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Austin,Tejas

Postby Mighty Professional » Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:10 pm

Watch Out For Snakes wrote:
tovegantinued wrote:I've been playing since CE. I've embraced every sequel and haven't been let down. People get "the demo's better" syndrome over CE and Halo 2. Which were great games. But sequels have to evolve, If they made Halo 2 again, it would be crap. Nostalgia aside, 3 and Reach were improvements in so many ways.

I didn't know what to expect with the transfer of Bungie to 343. But it honestly looks awesome and the only negative thing I've heard is people crying about the sprint feature making it like COD. Which is silly, it was my favorite load out on Reach and in no way imaginable has any Halo game ever felt like COD to me.

The controls for 3 were sluggish compared to 2, and the extra shit (jet pack, run fast, power shield) for Reach was just carbon copying stuff from other game franchises to stay relevant. Bungie has admitted that development for Reach was rushed and, by and large, the final product suffered for it.

Halo 2 was a nearly perfect game. Fluid controls, nearly flawless weapons choices, no superfluous bullshit features. Save for the glitches, hacks and triple shot BR nonsense, it was perfect. People get nostalgic over it because it was a superior video game.
This in essence is what made Halo so great. It had all the basic stuff nailed and no gimmicky shit. And then they made Reach which was an over-complicated clusterfuck of a game.
User avatar
Mighty Professional
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:19 pm

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:11 pm

tovegantinued wrote:I've been playing since CE. I've embraced every sequel and haven't been let down. People get "the demo's better" syndrome over CE and Halo 2. Which were great games. But sequels have to evolve, If they made Halo 2 again, it would be crap. Nostalgia aside, 3 and Reach were improvements in so many ways.

I didn't know what to expect with the transfer of Bungie to 343. But it honestly looks awesome and the only negative thing I've heard is people crying about the sprint feature making it like COD. Which is silly, it was my favorite load out on Reach and in no way imaginable has any Halo game ever felt like COD to me.

1. Different load outs to start the game, that's not like Call of Duty at all is it?
2. Ordinances that you get from getting kill streaks, that's not like Call of Duty at all is it?
3. No level system but rather you gain experience for every minute thing you do, that's not like Call of Duty at all is it?

Halo is basically copying just about everything COD does at this point and it is watering the games competitiveness down. You can definitely make the case that it makes campaigns much more enjoyable, but when it comes to multiplayer it is only getting worse. There are very simple fixes that would make the current state of Halo much more enjoyable in multiplayer, and just about every single one leads back to just simplifying it back to how the previous games were.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby tovegantinued » Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:26 pm

Watch Out For Snakes wrote:
tovegantinued wrote:I've been playing since CE. I've embraced every sequel and haven't been let down. People get "the demo's better" syndrome over CE and Halo 2. Which were great games. But sequels have to evolve, If they made Halo 2 again, it would be crap. Nostalgia aside, 3 and Reach were improvements in so many ways.

I didn't know what to expect with the transfer of Bungie to 343. But it honestly looks awesome and the only negative thing I've heard is people crying about the sprint feature making it like COD. Which is silly, it was my favorite load out on Reach and in no way imaginable has any Halo game ever felt like COD to me.

The controls for 3 were sluggish compared to 2, and the extra shit (jet pack, run fast, power shield) for Reach was just carbon copying stuff from other game franchises to stay relevant. Bungie has admitted that development for Reach was rushed and, by and large, the final product suffered for it.

Halo 2 was a nearly perfect game. Fluid controls, nearly flawless weapons choices, no superfluous bullshit features. Save for the glitches, hacks and triple shot BR nonsense, it was perfect. People get nostalgic over it because it was a superior video game.


I didn't find the controls sluggish. 10 minutes of gameplay on the campaign and I had the subtle changes down. Then again, I'm the guy that spent hours of embarrassing gameplay re-learning the controller with the claw grip. So I rarely find it hard to adapt to the controls of any game these days.

Halo 2 was leaps and bounds better than CE. But I don't find it to be superior in any way to Halo 3. They kept the good stuff and added some great stuff. And again in Reach. People don't like to learn or adapt to new things.
tovegantinued
 
Posts: 5175
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:31 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:44 pm

tovegantinued wrote:Halo 2 was leaps and bounds better than CE. But I don't find it to be superior in any way to Halo 3. They kept the good stuff and added some great stuff. And again in Reach. People don't like to learn or adapt to new things.

People don't like to adapt to things that water the play down. There a reason why in MLG game types you don't start with these abilities (jetpacks etc) and everyone starts with the same load out, because they don't improve the game play at all.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby J0eyCasco » Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:55 pm

CAN'T WAIT. :smt003
User avatar
J0eyCasco
 
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Boston

Postby Watch Out For Snakes » Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:22 pm

tovegantinued wrote:
Watch Out For Snakes wrote:
tovegantinued wrote:I've been playing since CE. I've embraced every sequel and haven't been let down. People get "the demo's better" syndrome over CE and Halo 2. Which were great games. But sequels have to evolve, If they made Halo 2 again, it would be crap. Nostalgia aside, 3 and Reach were improvements in so many ways.

I didn't know what to expect with the transfer of Bungie to 343. But it honestly looks awesome and the only negative thing I've heard is people crying about the sprint feature making it like COD. Which is silly, it was my favorite load out on Reach and in no way imaginable has any Halo game ever felt like COD to me.

The controls for 3 were sluggish compared to 2, and the extra shit (jet pack, run fast, power shield) for Reach was just carbon copying stuff from other game franchises to stay relevant. Bungie has admitted that development for Reach was rushed and, by and large, the final product suffered for it.

Halo 2 was a nearly perfect game. Fluid controls, nearly flawless weapons choices, no superfluous bullshit features. Save for the glitches, hacks and triple shot BR nonsense, it was perfect. People get nostalgic over it because it was a superior video game.


I didn't find the controls sluggish. 10 minutes of gameplay on the campaign and I had the subtle changes down. Then again, I'm the guy that spent hours of embarrassing gameplay re-learning the controller with the claw grip. So I rarely find it hard to adapt to the controls of any game these days.

Halo 2 was leaps and bounds better than CE. But I don't find it to be superior in any way to Halo 3. They kept the good stuff and added some great stuff. And again in Reach. People don't like to learn or adapt to new things.

You're telling me you thought the glaringly obvious change in sniper rifle controls from 2 to 3 was 'great stuff'? New, totally pointless grenades? Did you really think being able to carry around a mounted chain gun was some super cool addition to the game? Aside from the game veto option in multiplayer, VERY little improved between Halo 2 and 3.

So much from 3 and Reach is rigid and stupid. You feel like you're running/jumping with bricks tied to your feet half the time. They did it right with Halo 2, which is why it set a precedent for first-person shooters and is still heralded as one of the greatest games of the genre. They put out Halo 2 and it was 3+ years before they released a new game. Now, it's like every year and a half they're churning out some new, special feature bloated pile of shit.

It's obviously a matter of preference, but I think the new Halo games are way watered down to appeal to younger or impatient gamers. It becomes less about strategy and skill and more about who relies solely on stupid power-ups and super powerful vehicles to get through multiplayer games.
Watch Out For Snakes
 
Posts: 4310
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:07 pm

Postby Roofies Pizza » Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:49 pm

I played the shit out 3 and reach, and they are definitely a step up from 2. 2 was awesome, but each game got better for more fluid.

I never thought the controls for 3 were sluggish. ant you just turn up the thumb-stick sensitivity for that? The only thing I didnt like about reach, was the standard map pack. It was too redundant.

I wish I had an xbox for 4. I just got a PS3 and have been hooked on bttlefield, which to me is like Halo, but modern warfare. COD sucks. I'll probably never play it again.
User avatar
Roofies Pizza
 
Posts: 20305
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:05 am
Location: Washington state

Postby SexGod123 » Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:40 pm

I predict this will be GotY.
User avatar
SexGod123
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: Hampshire, England

Postby metalbeersolid » Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:46 pm

cannot wait for this, i literally played halo 2 multiplayer for like 5000 hours. One of the best online games I've ever played aside from counterstrike.
metalbeersolid
 
Posts: 1483
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:53 am
Location: Winnipeg

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:18 pm

I think 2 to 3 was just a matter of the getting used to the little changes. The sniper, the assault rifle instead of SMGS, no noob combo etc were all just little game play changes that took some getting used to. Once you got over the "Why isn't this Halo 2" you could realize it's a solid game.

Switching from 3 to Reach was changing from a Halo game to a game that didn't resemble Halo. The awful maps, bloom on shots, the ridiculous power ups on loadouts, no leveling system, it just wasn't memorable. It's a solid game but its a game like Call of Duty, I have nothing to strive for when I play the game and the gameplay itself is forgettable at best.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby Chill 'em all » Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

I will definitely be playing this under the name "SLUTBANGER"
User avatar
Chill 'em all
 
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:12 am
Location: You like it

Postby Baracka Flocka Flame » Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:39 pm

CreatexControl has a lot of this right.

My main thing is the level system. As soon as they did away with matching you against your equals to get people into games faster the way COD did, the game got stale. The changes between games are some good and bad. The DMR sucks, and I fucking hate jetpacks. Kill streak bonuses are dumb in the new one. But I just want a level system back. That goes up and down like in 2.
Baracka Flocka Flame
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: Atlanta

Postby YourXd43 » Fri Nov 02, 2012 1:55 pm

Baracka Flocka Flame wrote:CreatexControl has a lot of this right.

My main thing is the level system. As soon as they did away with matching you against your equals to get people into games faster the way COD did, the game got stale. The changes between games are some good and bad. The DMR sucks, and I fucking hate jetpacks. Kill streak bonuses are dumb in the new one. But I just want a level system back. That goes up and down like in 2.

The leveling system in 2 and 3 was really flawed but it did give me more incentive to keep playing. I wish they had refined it instead of scrapping it all together
YourXd43
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:48 am
Location: woodbridge

Postby YourXd43 » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:33 am

And then after I made that post yesterday they announced they will be bringing back ranked playlists with the 1-50 levels http://blogs.halowaypoint.com/post/2012/11/02/Halo-4-Competitive-Skill-Rank-Announcement.aspx
YourXd43
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:48 am
Location: woodbridge

Postby Queefer Sutherland » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:41 am

1) I got three red rings of death the other day. Can I fix it? It's the Halo 3 edition xbox, but I don't think that should make a difference.

2) I only want my xbox fixed so I can play this game.
Queefer Sutherland
 
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:45 am
Location: Athens, GA

Postby Watch Out For Snakes » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:41 am

YourXd43 wrote:And then after I made that post yesterday they announced they will be bringing back ranked playlists with the 1-50 levels http://blogs.halowaypoint.com/post/2012/11/02/Halo-4-Competitive-Skill-Rank-Announcement.aspx

As much as I loved this ranking system, it was definitely flawed like you mentioned. If you got matched up with a team of Cornell graduates who just want to fuck around and betray one another, you wind up de-leveling when you lose the game. It was nearly impossible to rank into the 30's on Halo 2 unless you had a competent team who actually wanted to play and win games, not just betray their teammate because he got to the sniper rifle before they did.
Watch Out For Snakes
 
Posts: 4310
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:07 pm

Postby YourXd43 » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:52 am

Watch Out For Snakes wrote:
YourXd43 wrote:And then after I made that post yesterday they announced they will be bringing back ranked playlists with the 1-50 levels http://blogs.halowaypoint.com/post/2012/11/02/Halo-4-Competitive-Skill-Rank-Announcement.aspx

As much as I loved this ranking system, it was definitely flawed like you mentioned. If you got matched up with a team of Cornell graduates who just want to fuck around and betray one another, you wind up de-leveling when you lose the game. It was nearly impossible to rank into the 30's on Halo 2 unless you had a competent team who actually wanted to play and win games, not just betray their teammate because he got to the sniper rifle before they did.

It's not going to be added until early 2013 because they want time to try to fix the system. I'm hoping they're able to make it less frustrating than it was in 2 and 3
YourXd43
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:48 am
Location: woodbridge

Postby volcano.maple » Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:37 pm

Game will hopefully be great. Just watching gameplay footage is getting me stoked as fuck.
User avatar
volcano.maple
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:59 am
Location: IL

Postby jennamerica » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:15 pm

Can't wait to be a dork recluse again.
jennamerica
 
Posts: 2678
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:35 pm
Location: Park City UT

Postby steveomarkx » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:44 pm

forever cursed wrote:I didn't think I'd be psyched but the reviews I'm seeing are slowly starting to change my mind. I thought ODST and Reach were the best in the series.


Took the words right out of my mouth. My expectations were pretty low until I saw all the reviews today.
steveomarkx
 
Posts: 5908
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:00 pm

Levels.
BRs.
No stupid health bars.

This game might not be too bad.

There's still jetpacks though. Fuck jetpacks.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby jennamerica » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:03 pm

CREATExCONTROL wrote:Levels.
BRs.
No stupid health bars.

This game might not be too bad.

There's still jetpacks though. Fuck jetpacks.

Jetpacks in multiplayer was retarded. I mean... after the game was infested with worthless mods I would just jetpack around and fuck with people.. still. stupid.
jennamerica
 
Posts: 2678
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:35 pm
Location: Park City UT

Postby the religion lie » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:05 pm

CREATExCONTROL wrote:Levels.
BRs.
No stupid health bars.

This game might not be too bad.

There's still jetpacks though. Fuck jetpacks.

They halved the amount of time you can use them. Odds are people will just avoid them. The team acknowledged their brokenness in Reach.

Here are two different videos highlighting the balance of the game, there's a ton of thought that's been put in:



the religion lie
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Postby xorangejuicex » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:05 pm

I saw a gameplay vid yesterday of someone getting the first matchmaking killionaire, it was pretty cool and get's me excited to play.
xorangejuicex
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:46 am
Location: Menifee

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:06 pm

jennamerica wrote:
CREATExCONTROL wrote:Levels.
BRs.
No stupid health bars.

This game might not be too bad.

There's still jetpacks though. Fuck jetpacks.

Jetpacks in multiplayer was retarded. I mean... after the game was infested with worthless mods I would just jetpack around and fuck with people.. still. stupid.

Abilities on load outs is the of the worst things implemented in Reach. They would be a solid addition if they were like the power ups in 3 and just placed around the map.


Also, does anyone know about the ordinance drops? Is that only going to be in infinity slayer and then just set weapon locations will be in normal slayer?
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby Watch Out For Snakes » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:09 pm

the religion lie wrote:
CREATExCONTROL wrote:Levels.
BRs.
No stupid health bars.

This game might not be too bad.

There's still jetpacks though. Fuck jetpacks.

They halved the amount of time you can use them. Odds are people will just avoid them. The team acknowledged their brokenness in Reach.

Here are two different videos highlighting the balance of the game, there's a ton of thought that's been put in:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98Kxy0TZrUY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSpE495P23Y

Holy fuck, is this guy in the video serious with the way he talks? :smt005

I get that you're under time restraints with these short videos, but god damn. Slow it down, motor mouth.
Watch Out For Snakes
 
Posts: 4310
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:07 pm

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:27 pm

After watching those videos those support packages and stuff look absolutely retarded.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Postby Baracka Flocka Flame » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:32 pm

YourXd43 wrote:
Watch Out For Snakes wrote:
YourXd43 wrote:And then after I made that post yesterday they announced they will be bringing back ranked playlists with the 1-50 levels http://blogs.halowaypoint.com/post/2012/11/02/Halo-4-Competitive-Skill-Rank-Announcement.aspx

As much as I loved this ranking system, it was definitely flawed like you mentioned. If you got matched up with a team of Cornell graduates who just want to fuck around and betray one another, you wind up de-leveling when you lose the game. It was nearly impossible to rank into the 30's on Halo 2 unless you had a competent team who actually wanted to play and win games, not just betray their teammate because he got to the sniper rifle before they did.

It's not going to be added until early 2013 because they want time to try to fix the system. I'm hoping they're able to make it less frustrating than it was in 2 and 3


I was a 37 in Halo 2. and a 49 in Halo 3. So I liked the ranking system.
Baracka Flocka Flame
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: Atlanta

Postby CREATExCONTROL » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:53 pm

Yeah I don't really know what the problem was with the leveling system. The only problems in my opinion were cheaters/derankers in Halo 2 and derankers/overall shitty teammates in 3.
CREATExCONTROL
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:31 am

Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ADAMGRZ, Alex K., askionkataskion, bangover, beheaded, Bing [Bot], BradK, Cannonball, Chad of the Dead, cliffross, connorxstein, Dangerous Breed, Depeche Mode, earl, Earth Lessons, fleshleather, forever cursed, Frederik, Gamblor, genu, Google [Bot], gregor samsa, GuyanaPunchLine, Ikilledmidnight, IronFistedFuckUp, it'sbeenasummer, Jafzewsdw, jj____, joshk, jpb, kaleidoscope, kennethfoxcastle, Mass Obliteration, Matt Murder, Matt V, MetalxSlug, Mr. The Plague, MSN [Bot], MSNbot Media, nu shooz, oldorder, ooGracie, Rogue Elephant, scrappydoo, Spice 1, StayCruel1212, Straight Outta Locash, suckitxxx, Supernintendo Chalmers, the clot thickens, The Rebel JMN, The World Is My Fuse, theonefreeman, TheyWalkedInLine, Think Again..., thisisourstruggle, tiny.atoms, traces.of.empire, tragedy, turningxtide, uglyjason, Welhammer, Wilson Phillips, xACEx, xNameHatex, xselloutx, ZachLeg, Zaph and 101 guests