OFFICIAL CYCLING, SHOT PUT AND PARCHEESI THREAD

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:42 am

Tonight! God it's been a long eight months.

P.S. join the pick 'em group:

http://games.espn.go.com/pigskin/en/group?entryID=287080&groupID=20119&message=groupCreated

Group: B9
PQ: kingjoey

by **lasting.values** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:45 am

i can't wait. steelers game is being shown live at 10:30am in australia.

will be getting so hepped up on goofballs tomorrow morning

by **Tomato.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:48 am

I signed up for this.

Ben raped that girl.

by **Tomato.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:51 am

Wait. Are you letting more than 6 people join?...

by **tragedy** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:53 am

Yeah, that shit's full man.

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:59 am

What? I didn't set a cap. Let me fix this.

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:01 am

Try now I guess? I used the same settings as the NCAA pick 'em group and that has 17 people in it so I don't understand what the issue is but I changed one thing so maybe that'll help.

by **EHJon** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:22 am

So glad that the regular season is here. Counting down until the Steelers get revenge on the Titans.

by FZ » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:34 am

DALLAS

COWBOYS

by **I GET MONEY** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:34 am

Go Bucs! Titans are going to stomp out the steelers tonight! Super stoked on football and fantasy also.

by **Tomato.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:41 am

Now that the Browns decided on Quinn as a starter, I'm curious to know if any fans of teams here with a bad QB would accept Derek Anderson as their starter through a trade.

49ers? Broncos? Redskins?

by **Ron Artest** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:58 am

posting before BronyTom jinxes a team to the nfl basement by picking them as a super bowl favourite.

by **Tomato.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:07 am

Packers in the Superbowl. Right in Favre's fucking face.

And I'm not a fan of either team.

by **Rowan** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:24 am

J-E-T-S

by **endtroducinggg** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:35 am

motha

fuckin

GIANTS.

by **Stoshenstein** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:37 am

Rowan wrote:J-E-T-S

I thought I was the only one. :smt006

by **Boner In Sweatpants** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:39 am

Here's to hoping the Browns can win at least 6 games this season. :smt012

by **krujones** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:47 am

bears
packers
first game of the season
sunday night
my birthday

cannot wait

by **Alex K.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:49 am

Oh, and time for an avatar change........

by **apollo kids** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:55 am

My "crazy" prediction? Both NFC wild card teams will be out of the NFC North.

Website · by **Mankind** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:58 am

Alexander K. wrote:

What a hunk.

Oh, and time for an avatar change........

My soon to be avatar:

Soooo excited for this season.

by **Alex K.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:02 am

Mankind wrote:My soon to be avatar:

Soooo excited for this season.

Good choice, but mine's better.

:smt002

Website · by **Mankind** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:03 am

by **Alex K.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:10 am

I chuckled.

by **Tomato.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:11 am

It pisses me off that the Broncos arent at the very bottom of anyones power rankings.

McDaniels came in and tore a good team to pieces.

by **Boner In Sweatpants** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:18 am

Tomato. wrote:It pisses me off that the Broncos arent at the very bottom of anyones power rankings.

McDaniels came in and tore a good team to pieces.

If you consider a team with a horrific defense and no rb last season as a good team then you are right.

Website · by **Mankind** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:24 am

Anddddd the shit talking begins.

by **apollo kids** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:27 am

The best part about the Broncos situation will always be that Matt Cassell caused it.

by **xzn2p3** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:31 am

Boner In Sweatpants wrote:
Tomato. wrote:It pisses me off that the Broncos arent at the very bottom of anyones power rankings.

McDaniels came in and tore a good team to pieces.

If you consider a team with a horrific defense and no rb last season as a good team then you are right.

to their defense, they did have like 3-4 backs on IR and had to settle for a white guy at one point. and the defense could have been improved thru the draft

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:31 am

Early SB predictions?

Ravens over Packers.

by **krujones** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:32 am

when did the packers become the team to pick?

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:32 am

Boner In Sweatpants wrote:
Tomato. wrote:It pisses me off that the Broncos arent at the very bottom of anyones power rankings.

McDaniels came in and tore a good team to pieces.

If you consider a team with a horrific defense and no rb last season as a good team then you are right.

Their defense was atrocious but they were on their seventh running back. I've never heard of a RB situation that bad in any level of football. You have to imagine having their first or even second stringer in for the season would have gotten them at least one more win.

Which would have been enough for a playoff spot.

by **apollo kids** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:33 am

krujones wrote:when did the packers become the team to pick?

It's understandable, if their defense plays to 07 levels again they could easily run the NFC. Hell, they were probably better than the Giants that year if ole aw schucks Cornell graduate didn't try and force that pass in OT.

by **Billlll** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:33 am

GO BILLS.

by **Alex K.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:34 am

I Gave You Power wrote:Early SB predictions?

Ravens over Packers.

Oh god...

Patriots vs Eagles 2.0

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:37 am

krujones wrote:when did the packers become the team to pick?

When they have a top-5 QB, a top-5 WR tandem, a run game that will be much better than last year because there was no Grant injury or holdout, they become a legitimate contender.

Plus, B.J. Raji and Clay Matthews will bolster a defense that was a piece or two away from being a top-15 or even top-10 unit last year. With them switching to a 3-4, and Raji requiring double coverage, Hawk, Matthews and Nick Barnett will be able to plug the gaps and blitz much more easily.

Remember, their pass defense was very solid, it was just the run D that needed work and that's been addressed.

by **xzn2p3** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:40 am

Eagles/Packers Vs. Steelers/Patriots

copout I know but those 4 look scary to me.

by **apollo kids** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:41 am

I don't get how everyone loves the Eagles. Wouldn't be surprised one bit if they're an 8-8 team.

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:41 am

Hey you chaos pouch, pick two teams! None of this two possibilities nonsense.

by **Boner In Sweatpants** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:42 am

Steelers and Packers

Also I cant wait for TWO to blow up the Bills franchise

by **xzn2p3** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:44 am

apollo kids wrote:I don't get how everyone loves the Eagles. Wouldn't be surprised one bit if they're an 8-8 team.

New toys on offense and what should still be a pretty good defense even without Bradley.

I mean who else would I be high on?

Bears? Old defense that I don't think can get it done and unproven receivers.
Cowboys? Wade Phillips.
Giants? What receivers?
Cardinals? Maybe.. if the defense can be consistent.
Minnesota? I don't think Favre will be that great for 16 games.

by **xzn2p3** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:44 am

I Gave You Power wrote:Hey you chaos pouch, pick two teams! None of this two possibilities nonsense.

Eagles Vs. Steelers

by **Alex K.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:45 am

I don't know what I'd do if the Ravens made it back to the AFC championship game. I'd be ecstatic.

by **apollo kids** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:46 am

I'd take the Giants, Packers, Vikings and Falcons easily ahead of the Eagles. The Eagles will be cute on offense but give up 28 or so a game.

by **niggamortis** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:46 am

Rowan wrote:J-E-T-S

JETS
JETS
JETS

by **Alex K.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:47 am

xzn2p3 wrote:
apollo kids wrote:I don't get how everyone loves the Eagles. Wouldn't be surprised one bit if they're an 8-8 team.

New toys on offense and what should still be a pretty good defense even without Bradley.

I mean who else would I be high on?

Bears? Old defense that I don't think can get it done and unproven receivers.
Cowboys? Wade Phillips.
Giants? What receivers?
Cardinals? Maybe.. if the defense can be consistent.
Minnesota? I don't think Favre will be that great for 16 games.

Seattle!

by **I Gave You Power** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:52 am

Alexander K. wrote:I don't know what I'd do if the Ravens made it back to the AFC championship game. I'd be ecstatic.

Flacco in his second season will be very, very similar to Rofflesberger in his second season.

Bet it.

by **rahul** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:52 am

healthy LDT, jamal williams, cromartie, castillo, and semi-healthy shawn merriman, plus defensive depth improvements in the draft (larry english, brandon hughes, kevin ellison), along with continued excellent qb play from philip rivers make chargers my afc super bowl pick

unstoppable run game, stable smart qb play, additions of boley and chris canty, healthy usi, kenny phillips becomes a star, lack of number one wideout offset by tremendous depth at wide receiver and tight end, and giants are my nfc super bowl pick

the other championship game teams are ravens and panthers

chargers win the super bowl

by **Billlll** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:54 am

Boner In Sweatpants wrote:Steelers and Packers

Also I cant wait for TWO to blow up the Bills franchise

TWO? What does that even mean? T.O.?

by **Alex K.** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:55 am

Billlll wrote:
Boner In Sweatpants wrote:Steelers and Packers

Also I cant wait for TWO to blow up the Bills franchise

TWO? What does that even mean? T.O.?

He meant TOE.

OFFICIAL CYCLING, SHOT PUT AND PARCHEESI THREAD

Who is online